In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one.
Galileo
Rodolfo Martinez
Sherlock Holmes and the heir of one
Alamut, Madrid, June 2008
ISBN: 978-84-9889-008-2
Would be my third novel Sherlock Holmes. And also the last. For those coincidences of life (as I told here) ended up becoming the fourth. And last?
I would say yes, but at this point, of course, I will not dare to be categorical. So I say yes, that is the last, for now.
It has been four years of my life, since I started going to review Sherlock Holmes and the wisdom of the dead for editing Bibliópolis, until Sherlock Holmes and the heir to one in Alamut, the new label of Louis G. Prado.
Obviously, I have not spent those four years entirely devoted to Sherlock Holmes. I've written some other things (several already published, the other, I hope not soon see the light), I have reviewed earlier stuff (The gap in the mirror, for example, although not exclusively), and in general I 've managed to still have time to continue with my life.
But undoubtedly, the presence of Sherlock Holmes (and, above all, the fictional universe that was built around it) has been dominant in the literary sense, during these four years.
And what I feel now that it seems, I have finished my relation to the detective? In some relief. In part release. And partly, I will not deny, rather sorry that things have come to an end.
If they have done, of course. We'll see.
I am aware that there may be people who think they have written these novels and haberles devoted so much of my life, is a task wasteland. A waste of time, in a way. You might think that all that I have dedicated to the character of another, it's time and effort you've taken to work in my own work. In fact, I commented that it in Sherlock Holmes and the mouth of hell (or, more accurately, what did Rodolfo Martinez who translated the novel, that's not me, but a literary character who shares my name and some of my features).
I have that feeling, however. Not losing time, nor the time to be removing my own work. Among other things because these four novels are also my own work. As much mine as it may be the red king's dream, or Los hitmen sky, to name just two.
And on the other hand, these four novels have brought me plenty of perks. Not only for the host, generally favorable, they have had with readers, but because in the purely literary have been, for me, the most satisfying thing I've written. Not to mention that I've thrown them to try new things and techniques and narrative formulas that, for some reason do not fully understand, do not try in my other novels. Well, yes I do: at the end of the day, one of my constant is always looking for a way to have different things that I've previously tested, and no, not for the sake of experimentation, but by pure and simple fear of boredom. However, my Sherlock Holmes novels have been bolder than the rest of my work.
Why? I know, the truth. But throughout the four novels I have time and again embarked in areas not previously explored and, most importantly, I've done without fear and without stopping at the possibility of failure. I think I enjoyed looking for new things so well (completing the stage, looking for new insights provided interest was recreating the universe, trying their luck with ways of telling the story I had not used before, trying to approach the story from new places, metaliterary playing with aspects of the case) that even considered the possibility of crashing in the process.
He did then, of course. Once each novel. Here comes the insecurity: "I worked out well, I've screwed up? But those questions did not exist while writing. ... I think only the euphoria is the word, the result of doing something I liked and enjoyed the feeling of being like a baby every step of the process.
I am of those writers who have a good time with the writing itself (and as good friends, like Juan Miguel Aguilera, tell me that for them the physical act of writing is torture, I confess I am amazed and express my incomprehension) and I think which was in these novels that I enjoyed more. In a way I'm back to being a teenager and I've written without worrying about what might happen, where it was coming or what was meant to accomplish. Just roughing fear was writing. As long ago that I enjoyed.
I again become, in some ways the child you Superman, Phileas Fogg, Zorro, Spiderman, The Black Pirate, Old Shatterhand, D'Artagnan, Tarzan, Tom Sawyer, Michael, the Avengers, Shane, Scaramouche ... and, of course, Sherlock Holmes himself, lived in the same universe at different times or different places, but in the same fictional universe. So that one day I arrived to find desabellado appeared. In fact, I remember when as a child, a friend brought back from Germany the comic with the first meeting between Superman and Spiderman, found nothing strange about that. At best, I wondered how it was that they had not met before, living so close.
I'm back to being that child, he said, and I reconstructed on paper what he had then in my head. Such a universe where everything had a place and anything could happen. And in the process, as I said, I've spent some time as I enjoyed that.
Let it fall into the pernicious vice of self-quotation, and ending with a short paragraph that I included in the acknowledgments of Sherlock Holmes and the heir to anyone:
Does that mean it's over, no longer write more novels of Sherlock Holmes? It is likely that this is (though not entirely abandoned the idea of a book of stories about the detective, but that's another story).
But, does that mean I'm done with the fictional universe I've been re-created in these four novels? I would say no.
The only question really is when will it. We'll see, I do not think too much longer. I like too be there.
© 2008, Rodolfo Martinez
Similar entries: