Is there freedom without information is not distorted? "Written in water

Written in the water Rodolfo Martinez's blog

14 Sep/09 511 / 6

Is there freedom without information is not distorted?

Through the blog Dissecting The Country (full of controversial opinions, but with incisive mind pointed in the right spot, no doubt), I found the famous early Goebbels to manipulate the masses, excellently presented and summarized. Here they are:

  1. Principle of simplification and single enemy: Adopt a single idea, a single symbol. Identify the adversary on a single enemy.
  2. Principle of the method of transmission: Gather several opponents in a single category or individual. Opponents have become individualized sum.
  3. Top of transposition: Load on the opponent's mistakes or shortcomings, answering the attack with the attack. "If you can not deny the bad news, they invent other than distract.
  4. Top of exaggeration and misrepresentation: Convert any story, however small, in serious threat.
  5. Top of vulgarization. "All propaganda must be popular, adapting its level at least intelligent of individuals to whom it is aimed. The larger the mass to convince smaller must be the mental effort to perform. The receptivity of the masses is limited and little understanding; also have to forget easily.
  6. Top of orchestration: "The propaganda must be limited to a small number of ideas and repeat them endlessly, again and again present them from different perspectives, but always converging on the same concept. No cracks or doubts. " From this comes the famous sentence: "If a lie is repeated enough, eventually becomes truth."
  7. Top of renewal: We have to constantly deliver new information and arguments at such a rate that, when your opponent responds, the audience is already interested in something else. The responses of the opponent should never be able to counteract the rising level of charges.
  8. Principle of verisimilitude: Constructing arguments from multiple sources, through the so-called balloons or fragmentary information.
  9. Top of silencing: Silencing the issues which have arguments and not hide the news that favor the adversary, also counterprogram with the help of related media.
  10. Top of transfusion: Generally, propaganda always operates from a pre-existing substrate, either a national or a complex mythology of hatred and traditional prejudices. These arguments take root spread in primitive attitudes.
  11. Principle of unanimity: Getting to convince many people that think "as everybody," creating a false impression of unanimity.

The conclusion is that those are exactly the principles that those in power (whether political, economic or media ... if the three are not one and the same) are being applied again and again to disguise the reality at your convenience and not allow us to see what happens but what we want it to be happening (the media coverage of student protests before the Bologna Process is a perfect example of this, without going further).

Is it possible freedom in ignorance? "We live, as Chomsky says, in a system that can be defined as" brainwashing freedom "? What matters, in short, we have the ability to decide what to do with our lives if the information we use to make these decisions is manipulated, distorted and filtered previously? Is not it becomes that time the term "democracy" a bad joke?

Because, after all, which identifies a system as democratic is that there is no parliament or elections. It's as simple as the idea that power is in people; is theirs and they decide how to use it and he appoints. How can we say without being naive, that power in Western democracies is in the public?

After all, it is impossible to have power without information. And clearly we do not.

© 2009, Rodolfo Martinez
The writer writes his book to explain to himself what can not be explained.
Gabriel García Márquez

Did you like this article?

Consider subscribing to our feed!

Comments (6) Trackbars (0)
  1. More than half of the principles you mentioned, appropriately tailored, apply to commercial advertising. In fact, one could say that Goebbels was the father of modern advertising.

    However, what really lack of information? Rather I would say that what we suffer information overload is a mixed, albeit with large doses of misinformation. The problem is to distinguish the wheat from the chaff. If you know the mechanisms of the "propaganda" you can come to see a glimpse of reality.

    I do not know who said that humans have never enjoyed such freedom as today, and yet has never been so controlled.

  2. You're right in what you say: we have the information there.

    The problem is you have to look. It requires an effort, you have to separate the noise. And the problem is compounded when the dominant media, increasingly there is a single vision of what is happening, and increasingly serve some special interests. In these circumstances, to separate the noise of this information and disinformation is becoming more difficult.

    Her comments on advertising, not surprising and it may already have heard you comment some time. The problem is that applying these techniques to advertising, is one thing. For the processing of information is another, more cheeky humor.

  3. For some fear the network, because they know very well as does the spread of information in it. And they are unclear how to control it.

  4. The textbook publishers are also collaborating excited. In the final analysis they are a business. What interests them is cornering the market and not publish good books once I started writing books for the publisher Anaya (I will not bother to hide the name, it is known) and one of his bosses called me and I said it was sending texts were fine, but they were "too much". And topped with these exact words, I have never forgotten: "You you have to do is to tebeítos subnormal. That ended my relationship with the editorial.

  5. Namesake, I think Goebbels learned almost all of Edward Bernays, and this, in turn, based his theories applied to the manipulation of the masses in his uncle Sigmund Freud. If you read on I see as "the character of the XXth century's most influential shadow" you will remain stunned. If he was the father of modern advertising and inventor of public relations.
    Pleased to meet your opinions, Rodolfo, if you argue mine.
    Greetings.

  6. Namesake: true, Bernays was the father of public relations and strategic models were a model for other fields of "persuasive communication". In fact, most of his techniques are still used today. However, the contribution of Guebbels was made novel use of mass media, particularly radio.

    The truth is that sucks a bit to recognize the talent of a bastard as Goebbels, but what there is. Probably, he and Speer were the only moderately intelligent jerifaltes Nazis and the rest, with Hitler and Himmler in the lead, apart from a few criminals were a bunch of idiots.


Leave a comment


Trackbacks yet.